Using colloquial language is a breeding ground for making grammatical mistakes. One popular example of these mistakes is the use of “naïve” versus the word “ignorant”. Is there a difference, really? If listening to casual conversation between many people, it may not appear to be the case that they are different. However, the truth is the two are very different indeed. The key is to understand the true meaning of the words and then to use them accordingly rather than to fall into the speech habits of those around us. Having proper speech of course impacts our ability to communicate effectively and accurately in even a written context.
When someone is considered “naïve”, they are actually being defined as someone without much experience, or even as someone who doesn’t know any better and that it’s not his or her fault that he or she is so clueless. “Naïveté” is therefore a state in which a person is almost blameless incapable of understanding something. An example might be if someone always tries his hardest at work, but his coworkers despise him for being a show-off. He might be naïve by not understanding why someone would dislike him when, in his eyes, he is trying his hardest to be valuable and even liked.
On the flipside, being “ignorant” is lacking the knowledge of something rather than comprehension. The components of the word “ignorant” in fact come directly from Latin and describe “lack of knowledge”. The differences are subtle, but meaningful.